This project is a collaboration among the United States Botanic Garden, San Diego Botanic Garden, USDA ARS, Geospatial Centroid at Colorado State University, and NatureServe. We are all grateful for your time and consideration in this evaluation effort.
Vitis
Home Page
All
Vitis County Maps
If you are evaluating these maps, please be sure to complete the
initial
registration
form.
Listing
of all occurrence records for all species
Listing
of all USDA Plants and Bonap records
Taxon : Vitis labrusca
Accepted
Synonym(s) : NA
Excluded from concept :
NA
NatureServe Concept Reference: Kartesz 1994
Relationship to Flora of North America: Equal
Taxonomic Notes: While Vitis labrusca is considered a
distinct taxon (Flora of North America 2016), certain accessions sampled
from Virginia and Connecticut populations may not belong to the V.
labrusca clade, based on molecular data. Further work is needed to
determine if these populations represent species other than V. labrusca
(Wen et al. 2018). Vitis labrusca hybridizes with V. riparia, resulting
in Vitis x novae-angliae (Walker et al. 2019).
NatureServe
Classification Status: Accepted/Standard
NatureServe Distribution: Canada (N1): NB (SNA), NS
(SNA), ON (S1) United States (N5): AL (SNR), AR (SNR), CT (SNR), DC
(SNR), DE (S4), FL (SNR), GA (SNR), IL (SNA), IN (SNR), KY (S2), MA
(SNR), MD (SNR), ME (SNR), MI (SNR), MO (SNR), MS (SNR), NC (S4), NH
(SNR), NJ (S5), NY (S5), OH (S3), PA (S5), RI (SNR), SC (S4), TN (SNR),
UT (SNR), VA (S5), VT (SNR), WV (S5)
NatureServe
Explorer: https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.131865/Vitis_labrusca
This species is included in FNA : TRUE
All county level features report information that as aggregated to the county level. This include text reference to the county (state/county) and spatial point reference that occur within the county.
Data was gathered at the Genus level from the following
public repositories - Seinet - Genesys - Wiews - GRIN - USDA Plants - Crop Wild Relative 2020 publication
Sourced through communication with data owners - 2023 Botanical Garden Survey – available in the full source data - BONAP - IUCN
data standardization : All data sets were altered to matched a standard data structure. The specific translation of data sets can be seen here.
Taxonomy: The full synonyms cross walk can be viewed here.
When latitude and longitude data was used to assign the state/country when possible. If no latitude and longitude data was provided, the state and county names were pulled from the attribute data associated with the record. If a state or county name could not be assigned by either method the record was excluded from this analysis.
If state level distribution information was provided for a given specific species, that information was used to filter the states in which counties are evaluated.
This table includes all records used to generate the map.
The table below displays additional attribute data for all the counties with known occurrences. Columns can be filtered and sorted. The following states are included in this FNA state designation: Kentucky, Alabama, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Indiana, Massachusetts, Illinois, Vermont, New Hampshire, Delaware, Connecticut, Ohio, Wisconsin, Mississippi, North Carolina, Virginia, New York, Michigan, New Jersey, Maryland, South Carolina, Maine, Rhode Island
The above map and table includes all occurrence data that falls within the established state range defined by Flora of North America.
If the state range for a species was defined by Flora of North America all the occurrence records will be shown on the map and above table.
The table below shows the occurrence data that falls outside the established Flora of North America states.
The following States are included in the FNA description: Ontario, Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin